The time for muscular communitarianism has come. In his second year,
President Obama best reveal that his communitarianism is not powerless,
but indeed has muscles of its own, although these have so far been
rarely exercised.
The president has gone the extra mile to show that he is willing to talk, consult, and collaborate with allies and foes alike -- foreign and domestic. Nor has this form of kumbaya communitarianism been without results. Russia and China are supporting sanctions against Iran. The fever of anti-Americanism overseas has subsided some.
But, all said and done, Obama's soft communitarianism has yielded relatively little. Iran continues to thumb its nose at his solicitations; the GOP is mocking it; and the business elites are paying out their bonuses using taxpayer dollars, as if Obama never railed against them. Obama can maintain his positive posture, continue to refuse to hector nations whose regimes are different from ours, and even keep extending an olive branch to the business elites. But he would be much more effective if he would show that communities whose norms and leaders are ignored can twist the arms of, even give a kick in the pants to, those who refuse to collaborate.
A good place to start is with AIG. It has openly thumbed its nose at Obama by paying bonuses to executives using bailout money and by lobbying against pay curbs on top executives. Indeed, its CEO went as far as to announce that the US government was no match for him, as his anatomy had a bigger part than that of Washington. At the same time, AIG is still teetering and is dependent on scores of billons of dollars of federal help. This help should not be granted unless AIG mends its ways, posthaste. If it fails at this point, given the scope of the recovery abroad and in the US, there is little reason to believe the rest of the system will spin out of control. However, AIG's demise would send a message to one and all that the Obama administration's good will is not boundless..
On the international level, Iran is an obvious candidate for the lesson that communitarians are not chumps. However, before the US can proceed, it may well need more Russian collaboration. The Russians quite openly consider Obama a soft touch. Whatever concessions the US has made to "reset" the tone, the Russian leaders have pocketed and rushed to demand more. The place to show Russia that the US is not a patsy is in the negotiations over the extension of the START treaty, which the Russians are much keener to conclude than we ought to be. Hence, if they do not help much more in ensuring that Iran will not develop nukes, we should not rush to reduce our nuclear forces to the levels they prefer.
There are surely other ways to show some muscle than those I just suggested, and without leaving a horse's head in the beds of Senators Lieberman and Nelson. However, Obama better back up his good cheer with some powerful acts, or he will soon have little leverage left from his blessed communitarianism.
The president has gone the extra mile to show that he is willing to talk, consult, and collaborate with allies and foes alike -- foreign and domestic. Nor has this form of kumbaya communitarianism been without results. Russia and China are supporting sanctions against Iran. The fever of anti-Americanism overseas has subsided some.
But, all said and done, Obama's soft communitarianism has yielded relatively little. Iran continues to thumb its nose at his solicitations; the GOP is mocking it; and the business elites are paying out their bonuses using taxpayer dollars, as if Obama never railed against them. Obama can maintain his positive posture, continue to refuse to hector nations whose regimes are different from ours, and even keep extending an olive branch to the business elites. But he would be much more effective if he would show that communities whose norms and leaders are ignored can twist the arms of, even give a kick in the pants to, those who refuse to collaborate.
A good place to start is with AIG. It has openly thumbed its nose at Obama by paying bonuses to executives using bailout money and by lobbying against pay curbs on top executives. Indeed, its CEO went as far as to announce that the US government was no match for him, as his anatomy had a bigger part than that of Washington. At the same time, AIG is still teetering and is dependent on scores of billons of dollars of federal help. This help should not be granted unless AIG mends its ways, posthaste. If it fails at this point, given the scope of the recovery abroad and in the US, there is little reason to believe the rest of the system will spin out of control. However, AIG's demise would send a message to one and all that the Obama administration's good will is not boundless..
On the international level, Iran is an obvious candidate for the lesson that communitarians are not chumps. However, before the US can proceed, it may well need more Russian collaboration. The Russians quite openly consider Obama a soft touch. Whatever concessions the US has made to "reset" the tone, the Russian leaders have pocketed and rushed to demand more. The place to show Russia that the US is not a patsy is in the negotiations over the extension of the START treaty, which the Russians are much keener to conclude than we ought to be. Hence, if they do not help much more in ensuring that Iran will not develop nukes, we should not rush to reduce our nuclear forces to the levels they prefer.
There are surely other ways to show some muscle than those I just suggested, and without leaving a horse's head in the beds of Senators Lieberman and Nelson. However, Obama better back up his good cheer with some powerful acts, or he will soon have little leverage left from his blessed communitarianism.
Who says Obama is a communitarian? He didn't campaign as one. He never even uttered the term. So if he's a communitarian now we have to have a serious discussion.
Also, hate your use of the term "norm." The goal of society isn't normalcy for all individuals, the goal of society is the maximum amount of individual freedom possible without anarchy. Better to talk of tolerating quirks than enforcing norms.
Posted by: Mike M. | January 19, 2010 at 11:51 PM
Hi Mike , communitarianism emphasizes the need to balance individual rights and interests with that of the community as a whole, and that individual people (or citizens) are shaped by the cultures and values of their communities. So in that sense Obama's campaign was communitarian.
- Mathew J.
Posted by: sale beds | February 14, 2010 at 07:53 AM
For active rapidshare users one of the most convenient ways of finding films/music at rapidshare is to use rapidshare SE ( http://rapidqueen.com )
Posted by: Kaya | March 12, 2010 at 07:48 AM
I do not agree with the policy of obama.He is anti muslim
http://hotwallpapers4u.com/
Posted by: Alex | April 05, 2010 at 02:56 PM
The president has gone the extra mile to show that he is willing to talk, consult, and collaborate with allies and foes alike -- foreign and domestic. Nor has this form of kumbaya communitarianism been without results. Russia and China are supporting sanctions against Iran. The fever of anti-Americanism overseas has subsided some.
Posted by: buy kamagra | April 26, 2010 at 05:36 PM
Obama is most certainly communitarian to the core. Remember that his roots are as a *community* organizer...all of the emphasis on "service" is part of the communitarian agenda...his entire platform is communitarian.
It will be interesting to see if Mr. Obama and Mr. Etzioni are big enough to acknowledge that the recent economic turmoil in the EU is caused by the failure of fundamental communitarian principles.
This will serve to demonstrate who is truly interested in advancing the greater good, and who is really just seeking to gain control over his fellow man.
Posted by: Anon A. Mous | May 11, 2010 at 01:42 PM
The ambition of association isn't course for all individuals, the ambition of association is the best bulk of alone abandon accessible after anarchy.
Posted by: Vimax | June 07, 2010 at 06:09 AM
I do not agree with the policy of obama as well!
Posted by: last longer in bed | June 14, 2010 at 05:29 AM
// The time for muscular communitarianism has come. //
" In the US army journal Military Review, Etzioni urges a US attack that targets not only Iran's nuclear facilities but also its non-nuclear military assets, including infrastructure -- meaning, the civilian society. "This kind of military action is akin to sanctions - causing 'pain' in order to change behaviour, albeit by much more powerful means."
http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20100702.htm
Communitarian punishment, eh?
Posted by: dz alexander | July 04, 2010 at 03:52 PM
The theme what you have written is deeply attracted me. Thanks for sharing your own blog ith us.
Posted by: Nike Shox R4 | July 12, 2010 at 03:53 AM
It's nice to see someone who actually proposes an idea, instead of just complaining about things with no suggested course of action.
Most people just whine too much.
Posted by: Brian can last longer in bed | July 24, 2010 at 08:29 PM
Great one
Posted by: liability insurance texas | July 30, 2010 at 03:38 PM
The ambition of association isn't course for all individuals, the ambition of association is the best bulk of alone abandon accessible after anarchy. http://www.fullmediafire.com
Posted by: Libby | August 13, 2010 at 03:45 AM
show me your muscle :D
Posted by: viagra | August 19, 2010 at 09:02 AM